[frnewsjunkie]

I’ve been blasting Sessions since he started this morning... for his lack and etc... but I did not hear him say your quote. He said almost that, but not exactly.. can you point to where his exact words were on a special prosecutor?

(I heard him say that “looks like” was not enough evidence... however there are crimes that are not hearsay or “looks like” and he did not answer that one when Mr Jordan was asking the questions. The difference between saying he would not have a special counsel for “looks like”, and actually considering a special counsel as we speak, for evidence he has... are 2 different situations. He has already told congress he is considering investigating what he has been asked to do, with evidence that has been thrust on this reluctant AG. I’ve been sorely disappointed in Sessions this morning.. but I don’t think he ruled out anything... he was just not too friendly to our Mr Jordan this morning and it didn’t set well with many of us.)

[a little elbow grease]

... but I did not hear him say your quote. He said almost that, but not exactly.. can you point to where his exact words were on a special prosecutor? (I heard him say that “looks like” was not enough evidence... however there are crimes that are not hearsay or “looks like” and he did not answer that one when Mr Jordan was asking the questions. The difference between saying he would not have a special counsel for “looks like”, and actually considering a special counsel as we speak, for evidence he has... are 2 different situations. He has already told congress he is considering investigating what he has been asked to do, with evidence that has been thrust on this reluctant AG. I’ve been sorely disappointed in Sessions this morning.. but I don’t think he ruled out anything... he was just not too friendly to our Mr Jordan this morning and it didn’t set well with many of us.)

____

Agreed......