Fine. It all has to be aired in public. Carefully-worded allegations made by a woman’s lawyer about alleged incidents from 40 years ago is not a public airing. Put the woman on the stand and have direct and cross-examination, about the car, the yearbook, everything. Produce samples of Moore’s signature and compare them. They want a public airing, give it to them. Right before the election, with whatever discovery can be had, a moot court trial.
Nobody’s word should be taken as gold. Gold has to be tested before it’s proven gold. But if it is gold, it’ll withstand the test.
What disturbs me most about the Moore case is that the lawyer’s statements are taken as true simply because she claims to have a client who told her to make those statements.
.
>> “It all has to be aired in public.” <<
LOL!
Let us know when you take over one of the MSM fake news networks, and allow the printing of real news!
It has been aired on the honest programs like InfoWars.
.