Replies

How did the WashPoo know about her or the allegation?

It suggests that there was actually some contact between Moore and the girl in the 70s. If the woman needed convincing to talk, it suggests somebody else in Etowah County knew that something happened and got the Post in contact with reluctant accuser. I do not think the information in this Breitbart story helps Moore's cause.

I agree with the premise in your second sentence: 'somebody else in Etowah County knew ...', but not with the premise in your first sentence: 'It suggests that there was actually some contact between Moore and the girl in the 70s'.

I think a more probable scenario is that the girl had some contact with an older man in the 70s, but she just claimed this older man was Moore in her conversations with this 'somebody else' in order to enhance her story. She never intended for the story to go beyond yakking with her 'friend' - but later her 'friend' contacted the Post - and now she is stuck with the story. He said/she said - and Roy Moore can't prove otherwise. Guilty until proven innocent - as the esteemed Congressman from New York, Peter King, said....

Although no crimes are claimed - I'll go with Roy Moore's recollection.

Could be they just looked up divorce cases from the period when he was working to see if there were any with kids involved, then looked through those to see whatever became of those kids to find out if any had trouble or debt they could offer to fix. Desperate people might welcome some under the counter cash- same thing the Russians KGB used to do to find a useful mark willing to spy for them- first fiind debt or bad habits.

She would have been a jackpot with multiple marriages and the bad check and especially if they found a drug addiction, too.

There would be no need for any actual contact, just the need for them to be in the same building at the time. The other two women with whom nothing uncivil happened are just there to provide the appearance -to people who only read headlines- that there was a “pattern” so the first gal would not be summarily dismissed due to her problems.

But think about it...they dug all the way back to 1979 and that’s the very best they could do for a “scandal?”

I do not think the information in this Breitbart story helps Moore’s cause.

And it’s the second one like that. The first was the one where the accuser didn’t have a private phone line in her bedroom at 14. Aha! But no. The mom admitted she did have a phone that reached to her room, on the family line. And the mom not only backed up the story but explained how Moore groomed her first, to be alone with her daughter. I thought it was dumb of Breitbart to push that one.

It suggests that there was actually some contact between Moore and the girl in the 70s.

How do you figure that?

It only suggests that they trolled a wad of cash through a trailer park and found a slutwhore that would say anything for a payoff.

If the fourteen year old from a broken home had an experience with any older man it would be easy to transfer that to the accusation against the Judge now, to make her story plausible to idiots and liberals, "but I repeat myself" to quote Twain.