Posted on 11/09/2017 7:14:54 AM PST by TangledUpInBlue
Brazile discussed Richs death at least once with Hillary Clinton, she wrote, in a phone call after the 2016 election. Dont forget the murder of Seth Rich, I told her. Did she want to contribute to Seths reward fund? We still hadnt found the person responsible for the tragic murder of this bright young DNC staffer, she wrote. Clinton apparently responded, Youre right.... Were going to get to that. Then Clinton ended the call, according to Brazile.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
The Clintons are like sharks in water. They need to keep moving to breathe. Power is their water. Money keeps them swimming. Take away any one and they die quickly.
She is getting some dem problems out in the open, in order to get beyond them.
OTOH the GOP festers, sits in denial.
“How about asking her what John Podesta meant about killing whoever leaked DNC emails as an example? Things dont get much more Occumish-razorish than that!”
Well, maybe just read the actual emails instead of out of context quotes (misquotes even) from the sensationalists? The email chain does explain exactly what was being talked about. The “making an example” wasn’t about killing anyone, it was about rescinding job offers to people caught leaking to the media about the Hillary campaign. It certainly wasn’t about the DNC leak, which happened over a year AFTER that email was sent.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36082
LOL!! NO KIDDING!!!
Thank you for the link. It was good to be reminded of the actual context, which was more in line with how Hillary’s campaign people were upset with the idea of a few big mouths blabbing to the press that they were trying to rebrand Hillary. She just never had a very good image with the little guy, and the WaPo story wasn’t going to be helpful.
While Podesta certainly wasn’t referring to email leaks of the DNC/Seth Rich/Wikileaks type, he did show a window into his thinking, however, by agreeing that they make an example out of anyone who did leak, as he put it, “whether or not we have any real basis for it.”
The point seemed to be that if you were someone who violated the trust of Hillary or her team, there were going to be stiff consequences. If you didn’t get permission from the brass to talk, you’d better not open your mouth.
(1) Hillary Clinton
(2) Barack Obama
(3) Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.