There are a lot of “nice” people with “nasty” coiled up in their soul. The bible says they speak words smooth as oil, but the poison of asps is on their lips. But that doesn’t just have to apply to talking, but to acting.
So you admit that your client's actions were insanely out of proportion to the circumstances, is that right, counselor?
There is a cover up here. No way a tackle from behind breaks all those ribs, bruises the lungs and breaks several teeth.
It’s like discussing if this was a “hate crime” (whatever that is) as to what made the neighbor snap. I’m no lawyer so I don’t know what the appropriate charge would be but 4th degree assault seems wrong.
Does it really matter *why* the neighbor snapped? I say not in a legal sense. Charge him with first degree assault or whatever and leave the armchair psychology alone.
This makes no sense at all. There is something we are not being told.
-An unprovoked attack
-A viscous attack at that
-Miniscule charges
-$7500 bail
-Talk of lawn waste displacement now denied my neighbor’s
Yup, something is missing.
ONe more attack by a liberal in a long line of attacks by liberals. I do not recall any conservative attacking, unprovoked, any liberal.
I wonder when the real story will come out.
The reason that Boucher’s attorney is trying to stick with the trivial matter defense is likely directly related to the fact that Boucher can and should be charged with the federal offense of assaulting a member of Congress which carries a fine and 12 months in prison.
I didn’t realize you could beat up a U.S. Senator and be out of jail in a matter of hours.