Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SES1066

From the article, it sounds like the payer of support will be liable for the income tax on the support money, but the recipient will no longer claim the support money as income.

My interpretation is that this effectively keeps the income element with the higher-earner, presumably taxing it at a higher rate.

I don’t think it is being taxed twice, through the current or proposed process.


54 posted on 11/07/2017 1:17:50 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: NEMDF; Buckeye Battle Cry; Uncle Miltie; All

There’s at least 3 of us on this thread alone that will pay several thousands of dollars more in taxes as a result.

Extrapolate that througout the country and that 10’s of thousands of men being screwed by the Congressional Republicans. Maybe 100’s of thousands.

After being screwed over by their ex.


55 posted on 11/07/2017 1:22:15 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson