Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christian nurse sues hospital for requiring her to assist abortions
Life Site News ^ | 11/05/2017 | Claire Chretien

Posted on 11/06/2017 7:57:07 AM PST by SeekAndFind

DURHAM, North Carolina, November 3, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) – A Catholic nurse is suing Duke University Hospital, claiming that the university discriminated against her religious and pro-life beliefs by requiring her to assist in abortions.

Sara T. Pedro was told during her employee orientation that Duke University Hospital provides no exceptions to employees in its Emergency Department who don’t want to participate in abortions. The lawsuit, filed by The Thomas More Law Center on Pedro's behalf, says that Duke’s Emergency Department performs “a large number of abortions.”

The lawsuit claims that Pedro faced retaliation and discrimination after she made a written request to be exempt from the pro-abortion policy.

Duke wouldn’t let her advance from training to regular duty. The university then “issued her a written warning for vague and unsubstantiated reasons, and then placed her on administrative leave when she attempted to formally dispute the warning,” according to the Thomas More lawyers.

“This case illustrates the unfortunate dangers faced today by individuals who seek to remain faithful to their religious beliefs in the workplace,” said Tyler Brooks, the Thomas More Law Center attorney handling the case.

“With this lawsuit, however, we intend to show that even very large employers must respect the civil rights of their Christian employees,” he said.

The Thomas More Law Center says Duke violated state and federal laws.

“Because of her Catholic faith, [Pedro] objects to assisting in abortions, dispensing birth control and contraceptives, and receiving as well as administering vaccines,” the lawsuit says.

“Duke subjected her to a degrading series of actions designed to punish and retaliate against her for engaging in federally-protected activity,” it continues, noting it’s been more than 10 months since Pedro submitted her second request for religious accommodation.

Duke hasn’t responded or “otherwise provided an explanation as to how the request presented an undue hardship.”

Under the federal law civil rights law “Title VII, an employer is required to reasonably accommodate an employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs and religious practices, unless doing so would impose an undue hardship,” the lawyers explained in their lawsuit on behalf of the pro-life nurse.

Duke’s discrimination and retaliation against Pedro were committed with “the intent of forcing her out of her job with Defendant Duke,” the lawsuit argues.

Pedro attends daily Mass and prays the rosary for an end to abortion, the lawsuit says.

“Until recently being evicted from her home due to an inability to pay her rent, she kept a miraculous image of the Blessed Mother on her wall above a home shrine she made alongside the American flag presented to her father at his retirement from the National Guard,” it continues.

After she graduated from Mount St. Mary’s University and took her nursing boards in New York, Pedro went to daily Mass and prayed to God that she would pass the exam.

Inside the church that day, “she promised God that, if she passed her boards, she would serve Him as a nurse and always strive to be faithful to His teachings,” the lawsuit explains.

Pedro passed and went on to work at NYU Langone Medical Center and then the Burn ICU at New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center. In New York, she also trained to be a birth doula.

Pedro was never once disciplined by an employer during her tenure in New York.

The lawsuit highlights what it means to be a Christian who faithfully follows the 5th Commandment against murder, because abortion deliberately ends the life of a tiny, innocent human being.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; christian; christians; lawsuit; nurse; proaborts; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: momtothree

My guess, this would be referring to vaccines made from unborn babies’ cells, or developed through embryonic experimentation.


21 posted on 11/06/2017 1:50:15 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Abortion does not call into question the unborn baby's humanity, but our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

quick money....racking it all in and killing little unborn babies all in one fell swope...what’s not to love for an evil leftist..


22 posted on 11/06/2017 1:51:08 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cherry

They are evil.


23 posted on 11/06/2017 1:53:44 PM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: momtothree
"make it mandatory for employees and volunteers to get certain vaccines to prevent spreading it to patients"

actually, its to prevent the staff from getting sick from the patients as well....

can't be losing staff to illnesses...

24 posted on 11/06/2017 1:53:46 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

I’m shocked at how naive and uninformed FReepers are. Do you think that Catholic healthcare workers don’t have the potential to be required to violate their conscience in all areas, including the burn ICU? How foolish. ICU nurses are frequently confronted with end-of-life issues including passive and active euthanasia. Operating room nurses face abortion, sterilization, and gender reassignment procedures. Floor nurses and ER nurses can be forced to administer medications they are opposed to, such as abortifacients and hormone therapy for transgenders. Wake up. Our healthcare system has devolved into a cesspool. There are so many things that have little to do with restoring health these days. Instead of criticizing this nurse you’d all be better served by praying for these healthcare providers who are being thrown to the wolves.


25 posted on 11/07/2017 5:12:33 AM PST by surroundedbyblue (Proud to be an Infidel & a deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
I didn’t realize so many abortions were considered an emergency.

Exactly. What constitutes an "emergency abortion"?

26 posted on 11/07/2017 5:15:09 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue
Pretty sure Duke’s “no exceptions” policy is a violation of this nurse’s constitutional rights.

Constitutional rights protect us from the government, not us from our employer. She may have a claim under anti-discrimination laws depending on what North Carolina's laws protect.

27 posted on 11/07/2017 5:16:30 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson