Bush got rid of Saddam who was a tyrant. Getting rid of Saddam ultimately led to the rise of ISIS. Saddam had kept a boot on the ISIS types. Under Saddam, there weren’t beheadings and rapes and persecution of Christians and others on a mass scale. As bad as Saddam was, things were much worse for the Iraquis after he was overthrown.
Some regions of the world are just going to be ruled by tyrants. Whether that’s a matter of seeming preference as appears to be the case in South America, or whether that’s a matter of a populace that’s just so beaten down, war-torn and defeated that they can’t manage to sustain any other form of governance, is open to conjecture. Interjecting and attempting to manipulate these regions into a sort of American-style polyglot democratic republic clearly does not work, whatever the reason. At least Saddam was our tyrant, despite all the claims to the contrary. Look at what has arisen in the wake of his hanging by a military tribunal that we sponsored. Saddam was a scapegoat for 9/11 and he PO’ed the Bushes, so off with his head.
Bush is the Saudi’s bagman. The Saudis feared Saddam, so they instructed the blue-eyed infidels to take him out.