BOOM! Pamela Geller ROASTS Geraldo Rivera On Hannity!

thegatewaypundit ^ | Jim Hoft

[Fresh Wind]

Direct link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNSKBxHxTA0

[OKITRUMP77]

Same here. Can’t understand why Fox and Friends always gives him plenty of air time. I always mute him.

[Fresh Wind]

Jerry Rivers is an idiot thinking that truck rental people should not rent to suspicious people, and that would cure terrorism.

The first time they did that, a civil rights lawsuit would come down on them like a ton of bricks, just like what happened to the bakery that refused service to gays.

[outinyellowdogcountry]

Geraldo waxed on and on and Hannity cut off Geller. Frustrating. She didn’t get a chance to say much. Would rather hear from her than GR on the topic.

[litehaus]

I always mute him.

I do same for ‘Lil Juano’ Williams..in both cases everyone knows what is gonna come out of their mouths before they even say it...

[DIRTYSECRET]

Saw it. She put him in his place. He’s he one who was unhinged. Laughed.

[angryoldfatman]

d Populum sentiments. Thanks. Y’all made my very point. The FACT is, she was not “almost” killed. She was merely at the same venue where the Tangos attacked, where she was neither stabbed, shot at, bombed or any other method of violence.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Let’s see you organize an event at the nearest mall and two gunmen roll up to it. We’ll see how many internet arguments you win by shouting “ad populum” and “straw man” and “ad hominem” and whatever other bogus logical fallacy your type loves to repeat ad nauseum.

[MayflowerMadam]

She reminded Geraldo that once he said that after appearing with her, he “had to go home and take a shower”.

Isn’t that misogyny?

She really shut him down and shut him up on Hannity last night — and the night before, too, I think. Brigitte Gabriel is excellent, too. Libs say they like and want strong women. But they lie.

[A_Former_Democrat]

He came across as the total pro immigration racist he’s shown himself to be

She smoked him

[R4TB]

Let’s see you organize an event at the nearest mall and two gunmen roll up to it. We’ll see how many internet arguments you win by shouting “ad populum” and “straw man” and “ad hominem” and whatever other bogus logical fallacy your type loves to repeat ad nauseum

1. If Tangos rolled up to a venue, it would no longer be an internet argument, right?
2. Ad Nauseum is my favorite. Thanks for including it.
3. My type? You mean, conservative Veteran? Or the type that point out obvious flaws in "journalism" that other people take exception to because it aligns with their own personal thinking and makes them launch into speculations of similar scenarios to try and make a point ... about journalism?
4. In no way am I defending Hadjis; they got what they deserved in Garland, TX
5. Out.

[bgill]

Thanks for the link. Saw a moment of Jerry losing it last night so switched the channel. He’s gone off his meds again.

[ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton]

Yeah, watched it. Wish Whoraldo would retire with his harem and stay off the air.

[USS Alaska]

Wish Whoraldo would retire

I'd rather he die, but I'd settle for retirement.

[angryoldfatman]

If Tangos rolled up to a venue, it would no longer be an internet argument, right?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Look, he got the point! AMAZING!

You see, numbnuts, she was “almost killed” because Jihadis rolled up, and she was THEIR Tango, along with whoever else might be participating in the event of which SHE was the head.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3. My type? You mean, conservative Veteran? Or the type that point out obvious flaws in “journalism” that other people take exception to because it aligns with their own personal thinking and makes them launch into speculations of similar scenarios to try and make a point ... about journalism?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No, your type being insipid keyboard warriors who throw around Latin phrases that he read on “logical fallacy” websites instead of, you know, offering a viewpoint worth half a damn.

“Ad populum” = “Everybody else says it’s true, therefore it’s true”.

Nowhere does Pamela’s argument make this point.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4. In no way am I defending Hadjis; they got what they deserved in Garland, TX

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I say you are. By downplaying the threat involved, you might as well be from Democratic Underground saying the Muzzies were just there to engage in spirited debate with Geller and refute her horribly racist ideas.

Debate fully armed with her as their target, that is.

Sounds pretty defensive of the Religion of Peace to me, hombre.

[Political Junkie Too]

Rivera did the same thing to Michelle Malkin. He said he'd spit on her if he saw her.

-PJ

[R4TB]

Look, he got the point! AMAZING!

Unfortunately, you missed my sarcasm. Your sentence was pretty convoluted. Did you mean that I should organize an event and if two gunmen roll up that I was supposed to shout Latin phrases at them? Because that’s how it read. How would I “win” internet arguments when there was an obvious threat before me? But more so, why would I want to?

You see, numbnuts, (ah yes, minimize the messenger) she was “almost killed” because Jihadis rolled up, and she was THEIR Tango, along with whoever else might be participating in the event of which SHE was the head.

I like that you put it in quotes. Do you mean metaphorically? Do you mean philosophically? Surely you don’t mean according to the laws of physics, because there isn’t a formula that exists which would prove that Ms. Geller was almost killed.

No, your type being insipid keyboard warriors who throw around Latin phrases that he read on “logical fallacy” websites instead of, you know, offering a viewpoint worth half a damn.

Whoa! Not Latin phrases! One should never use other languages in discourse, right hombre? Are you having problems understanding my viewpoint? Let me try it one more time in plain english: Pam Geller was not almost killed. There. But, perhaps you can't follow simple points because you favor that phrase up there in quotes. So much so that you’ve used it more than once. What IS ironic, is that this very sentence of yours coupled with your attempt at minimizing me with name calling …. is the actual definition of logical fallacy itself. It continues throughout the rest of your post below. Now that’s funny right there.

“Ad populum” = “Everybody else says it’s true, therefore it’s true”.
Nowhere does Pamela’s argument make this point.

Nowhere did I refer to Pamela’s argument. Not once. My entire comment thread has been about GP erroneously using the phrase “almost killed”. However, by extrapolation, since you too agree with GP in saying that she was almost killed, you have bought into that spurious notion. Hence, Ad Populum.

In no way am I defending Hadjis; they got what they deserved in Garland, TX

I say you are. (Calling me a liar is just a result of your logical fallacy reasoning; accusations without knowledge, truth or merit.) By downplaying the threat involved, (I have done no such thing. There was a threat. There was a serious threat. And it was left bleeding out on the pavement before it gained entrance to the exhibit. And that is where the threat ended. At no point was Ms. Geller “almost killed”) you might as well be from Democratic Underground saying the Muzzies were just there to engage in spirited debate with Geller and refute her horribly racist ideas. Debate fully armed with her as their target, that is.

You typed this with a straight face, didn’t you? The sad part? You actually believe yourself when, out of thin air, you imagine and construct grandiose indictments against others based on ... wait for it ... ad populum sentiment.

Sounds pretty defensive of the Religion of Peace to me, hombre.

This is both laughable and untrue. Why you chose this argument is beyond me. Your entire commentary is based on minimization, deflection and name calling. Nothing you have said has even remotely or logically addressed the few points I’ve made. Rather, your rebuttals have devolved into fantasy notions of “what if’s” and “you might as well be’s” to “you’re a liar”.

And you call ME a Keyboard warrior.

Puhleez.

[TigersEye]

Geraldo: "This is the first successful attack since 9/11."

He has Alzheimer's.