Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NorseViking

Ridiculous. If an S-200 had hit the F-35, it would not have been damaged. It would have been destroyed.


4 posted on 10/28/2017 10:23:48 AM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: piytar
Ridiculous. If an S-200 had hit the F-35, it would not have been damaged. It would have been destroyed.

Yes!

6 posted on 10/28/2017 10:38:58 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: piytar

Agreed. With a 217 kg proximity fused, blast fragmentation warhead the S-200/SA-5 is very unlikely to only damage an F-35.


7 posted on 10/28/2017 10:39:28 AM PDT by InABunkerUnderSF (Bye Bye Jeff!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: piytar

Depends on the angle of arrival, head shot vs tail shot, etc...


13 posted on 10/28/2017 1:25:31 PM PDT by blackpacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson