Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investigate this (3)
Powerline ^ | October 28,2017 | Scott Johnson

Posted on 10/28/2017 8:37:23 AM PDT by Hojczyk

Following up on his comments yesterday, our friend with two decades of experience in counterintelligence as an FBI Special Agent writes to add “some additional context that may be be useful.” He writes:

Why was the “dossier” ultimately so important for the anti-Trump conspiracy (if you think of a better way of putting it, let me know)? The reason, I think, is that the use of standard political smears against Trump had proven ineffective. Therefore it became necessary to take it all a step further and to attempt to make some superficially credible allegations of action against the national interest (again, the vague allegations of Mafia ties had fallen flat).

We know that that effort began some time in the late Spring or early Summer of 2016 because an application was made to the FISC in June/July. That application mentioned Trump by name–and was rejected. Why FISA? Because a Title III “wiretap” would have required an actual investigation based on a violation of a real US criminal law and a quite high and specific standard in the application for a court order.

Why, you might ask, was that application even made? Why not rely on the flow of info coming from NSA, which notoriously scoops up virtually all electronic communications? The answer is that Trump and all those close to him were US Persons (USPERs). The NSA targets foreign powers and individuals. If those foreign powers and individuals of concern are in contact with USPERs and, in the judgment of NSA, US counterintelligence (basically, FBI) should know about those USPERs, then NSA informs the FBI.

(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: hillarytrumpdossier; investigate; obamafisa; obamatrumpdossier

1 posted on 10/28/2017 8:37:23 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

This just lays out the general assumptions most had as of six months ago, as to the purpose of the dossier and the “unmasking”.

As for the HRC corruption, this was no stretch at all, given the very nature of the foundation business and the nature of many of the already known donors. An open secret. And the Russian uranium case is just one of, most probably, dozens of others.


2 posted on 10/28/2017 10:38:00 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson