Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevao
Hard to believe that Mueller has had enough time to indict Comey. It takes months to build a case, hence the most likely appears to be Manafort or Flynn. The indictments will have nothing to do with collusion and more violations of law having to do with disclosure, reporting of income, or perjury.

I can recall Flynn offering to testify before Congress in return for immunity.

491 posted on 10/27/2017 8:36:27 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies ]


To: kabar
Hard to believe that Mueller has had enough time to indict Comey. It takes months to build a case, hence the most likely appears to be Manafort or Flynn. The indictments will have nothing to do with collusion and more violations of law having to do with disclosure, reporting of income, or perjury.

Why should it take any longer to build a case against Comey than against Manafort or Flynn? It might even be easier -- Comey may have perjured himself in Congress a couple months back. Plus they have him for illegal removal of government documents -- his Trump meeting "notes" -- which were subsequently leaked to the media.

Seems a perjury and government removal case against Comey would be much easier than some financial case against Manafort that would require tons of financial forensics to piece together.

525 posted on 10/27/2017 8:48:58 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson