Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCBryan1

I wouldn’t get too excited about what Panetta is saying, here. Go back and re-read it, he’s playing gatekeeper as to what should and should not be investigated, who did and who did not know anything, it would be interesting to do a venn diagram to see everybody he’s protecting with his direction and implication. Look here, not over there.


33 posted on 10/27/2017 9:56:30 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry

Seems to me that they have been given the directive to kick Hillary out as the face of the Party.... Must be getting a little to close to Obama


34 posted on 10/27/2017 10:00:11 AM PDT by theyreallthesame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry

“I wouldn’t get too excited about what Panetta is saying, here.”

Panetta is a Clinton Democrat. He was told what to say and when. He’s trying to frame the investigation. They will claim that only the lawyers broke the law while shielding Clinton. And then Hillary will say they’ve cooperated from the start and the matter is now closed.

And if those lawyers try to say anything not approved by the Clintons, they will be added to the Arkancide list.


43 posted on 10/27/2017 10:04:42 AM PDT by Azeem (There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson