Replies

“The women on this thread are not defending the attention seeker.”

I said people on this thread are defending BUSH, not the woman, who you refer to as an “attention seeker”, which is just your opinion, and nothing more.

“41 is harmless at this age”

Well apparently he’s not harmless, because someone is alleging that he committed a crime against them.

And all of the people on this page defending him and attacking her with no actual reason to do so other than oh he’s GHWB and he’s 93 ARE ENABLING HIM.

And that is how serial predators are made. They are surrounded by enablers who think that there is something in it to gain for themselves by defending this.

It’s disgusting.

Your behavior is disgusting.

If GHWB did what this woman alleges, then he is in fact a sex criminal.

Go let your daughter stand by him.

You are over the top. I have no love for any of the Bushes, especially 41 but he's a harmless old man stuck in a wheelchair. All she had to do was step aside. The woman has exhibited fake outrage. This is not the same as a Harvey Weinstein, which is how you're reacting.

“Well apparently he’s not harmless, because someone is alleging that he committed a crime against them.”

Interesting. We all know women don’t make up rape/sexual assault charges. So, saying he IS NOT harmless because of an allegation?

You: “If GHWB did what this woman alleges, then he is in fact a sex criminal.”

So we are entering the “if” realm but your posts indicate you believe he did because you side with the woman without considering that maybe she lied.

If he was accused by this same woman of murdering MLK, then the police should be called and an investigation should commence. An allegation is all that is needed.

But, we have common ground, it is an allegation, only. No facts or proof.

“And all of the people on this page defending him and attacking her with no actual reason to do so other than oh he’s GHWB and he’s 93 ARE ENABLING HIM.”

Wait. . .what? We are enabling him against what you admit is an allegation, and that is wrong? Could it be we support the Constitution.

We question the woman who made a serious allegation against a feeble old man in a wheelchair. You want the police called and investigate an allegation?

You: “If GHWB did what this woman alleges, then he is in fact a sex criminal.”

The word “IF” is instructive. Totally out of character, in a crowd with the wife and a photographer present, your initial reaction is to believe her and want a police investigation?

I have heard you sexually assaulted someone and the police must be called and the charge investigated, just to be sure, and if your co-workers, friends, family and neighbors hear you were investigated because you were accused of sexually assaulting someone, you know, women never lie and its about the seriousness of the allegation anyway, and I can count on many people forever believing you did sexually assault someone, regardless of the absence of proof.

And we all know, the absence of proof is proof of how good the cover-up is.