“The police can interview him and her and determine if there is a case or not.”
How? What evidence would exist of him briefly touching her bottom, even if it did occur? And what evidence would exist that it was an intentional grope? And in light of the many witnesses around and the highly public setting, what jury would convict him based on her allegations?
The case would need to be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Just how would you do that?
If the Bushes were decent men, they wouldn’t hang out with Bill Clinton. But the idea of a guy in his 90s “sexually assaulting” a woman in a public setting, from a wheelchair, surrounded by witnesses...just how ridiculous does an accusation need to be?
What next...accuse him of flying in an SR71 to Paris to make a deal?
Well, there's a clip on youtube of him doing as much to another young woman (named) before needing the wheelchair.
It’s up to the police and a prosecutor to make such a case.
The evidence that exists so far is her allegation of the incident. Further evidence would be his response to it to her and then to police.
Why did he apologize?
You know I can see now why our political class routinely victimizes us.
We allow it.
And then we defend them for doing.
Pitiful.