Says the law. Sexual assault is any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient.
Sexual assault is ... non-consensual sexual touching of a person.
Read your own posting. Then defend that idiocy to the guys in the Duke lacrosse case, or the men wrongly accused by Tawana Brawley. Or the thousands of other incidents where innocent men have been railroaded by phony "victims" who were either on power trips, wanted revenge, or were such prudes that even a causal nudge constituted a trauma for them.
There's a big difference between some decrepit geezer in a wheelchair pinching your behind and a gang of thugs dragging you behind a dumpster and ...
Yeah there is a big difference.
There are several degrees of sexual assault, and there is also rape.
The law really isn’t hard to understand, that is as long as you aren’t intentionally trying to misunderstand it as you and just about everyone else here clearly is.
If she can be proven to be a liar, then prove it, and sue her. If it can be proven that GHWB committed a sex crime against her, then charge him and try him.
No one gets any special consideration from me.
Can’t say the same for you though.
Apparently since he is a 93 year old ex-president, her allegation isn’t capable of being truthful.
Right? Is that correct?