That Paddock's house would be broken into while every square inch of his house was under intense scrutiny by the police and sheriff's department reeks of an inside job that allowed the home invasion. The CIA fits the bill of the type of connection needed to pull that off.
Paddock's being both a pilot and an accountant would have made him highly sought-after by the CIA. The cover story of being an ostensibly-professional gambler (able to beat the house with regularity) and yet supposedly "not at all savvy with guns," has his Marine ex-neighbor represented also reeks of being a fictitious act (another reason to think CIA).
Paddock's CIA associations not being aired in MSM news is further indicative of the MSM being on the Deep State leash.
The many things wrong with the official narrative further reeks of CIA. There were likely thousands of rounds fired, yet only dozens of fired casings were seen on the hotel room floor. None of those seemed to have burned into the carpet, which surely would have happened with casings from guns that fired so many rounds.
That Campos wasn't registered with the state as a security guard is an issue. That Campos had lots more gunshot reside on his hands than allotted by the official narrative is an issue. That Campos shares a Social Security Number with an illegal alien is also an issue, not to mention his avoidance of the press, even as he selectively told some of his story in an uncritical social TV setting--what, for money?
The only way all these issues begin to line up is when one considers that maybe, just maybe, its takes the government to mess up such a scenario so badly.
Yeah, Oswald Paddock, the lone gunman did it. /s You remember Oswald, the one the FBI had been paying $200/month and who was seen in the company of Officer Tippett and Jack Ruby prior to November 22, 1963, about which we found out about only 54 years later.
Paddock’s official story is like swiss cheese, full of holes and reeks of Agency involvement.
Oswald’s story is the same but worse since it undermined our democratic process of government. The questions left in 1963 are more complicated since it was the subversion of our system of elections and justice. The paper trail is littered with supplanted evidence and more than one handler dealt with Oswald, the patsy. This indicates that ‘63 was a group effort with the complicity of several, not the action of a few.
The cover-up and 50 year gag order on the related documents is just damning. Had modern forensic discovery been applied to the ‘63 crime scene and the related evidentiary documentation the CIA would have been uprooting their house. There would have been justice and accountability instead of no answers. Different political leaders would have risen to power. The Reagan legacy could have been extended for 8 more years since we would have been “Bush-less.” Imagine that!
The greatest damage to our system has been the unaccountability for Kennedy’s assassination. It emboldened the Agencies to act recklessly with impunity. Their corrupted and deadly schemes not only undermine our political process, they encourage others to cheat, steal and destroy lives to acquire power. Arkencide is the prime example of this destructive soulless practice.
This seems plausible to me: