Could a Grand Jury already be empanelled? The reason I ask is that yesterday I heard somewhere, some talking head suggest this. Then again this morning Chris Farrell was on the local radio and the host asked why hasn’t a grand jury been empanelled? Farrell answered “Maybe one already has and we wouldn’t know about it.”
Could this be why the DOJ hasn’t turned over documents to the various committees - he is using them in his investigation? And could this be the reason Sessions has been so “quite” on the Clintons & all the other investigations we have been clamoring about?
Just wondering if you have any knowledge about this.
I am almost certain a GJ is impaneled, that it has already had DEM witnesses called. In fact, I saw a news report that a D from the Podesta group was already called-—now, could be fake news.
And, yes, Sessions doesn’t broadcast his investigations, despite what some people want. That’s not how you prosecute. It weakens your case. And you drop the hammer, on everyone, all at once.
Reference: Gotti, ABSCAM, Hanssen