“...the court overturned previous decisions which held that drivers do not have rights under the constitution to refuse a breath test requested by law enforcement...”
Does this mean NO drunk tests without a warrant?
It sounds like they based it on first amendment rights, not fifth amendment.
In which case no drunk tests ever without consent.
It sounds like they based it on fifth amendment rights Can’t be compelled to testify against self) , not fourth amendment (unreasonable searches).
In which case no drunk tests ever without consent.