Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Clearcutting is a good way to go, as long as the land is replanted with a mix of trees. Putting it back in a single species limits the species of wildlife which will live there. If the timber companies want clearcutting, then they will have to comply with regulations, just like everyone else.


12 posted on 10/14/2017 8:56:04 AM PDT by snowtigger (Deplorable, and proud of it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: snowtigger
"Clearcutting is a good way to go, as long as the land is replanted with a mix of trees. Putting it back in a single species limits the species of wildlife which will live there. If the timber companies want clearcutting, then they will have to comply with regulations, just like everyone else."

In the sixties when I worked for the Forest Service while going to college, we planted mostly Douglas Fir in the clear cuts.

The reason why was because Douglas Fir is not a great competitor and need several years to establish themselves before other species that are more competitive crowd them out.

We also planted other species depending upon the environment and the lay of the land.

19 posted on 10/14/2017 9:34:58 AM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson