I’m sorry - I didn’t realize that my comment had a passive component.
I am still trying to discern the very basic Constitutional concept which you recognize but I don’t.
Please note that I am not denying that courts decide Constitutional questions - I am trying to figure the process by which the question would be placed before it.
One way is through legislation, which would be reviewed by the Court. (See Trumps immigration attempts.) Another is an by an aggrieved party, most of which would have a very high burden of proving standing, but likely tossed out of court before the Supremes even see it years later.
I didn’t mean anything personal against you.
You seem very upset about the media being targeted.