Yup!
And the narrative switcheroo was to protect MGM against LIABILITY.
Thi$ will be verrrry intere$$$$ting, I believe.
MGM believed if it could deny ANY employee had ANY knowledge of an armed guest prior to the CROWD part of the massacre, then they’d be on firmer legal footing.
Ergo:
“Crowd shooting AND THEN guard got shot”
And they all koo’ed about what a biiiig hero he was/is.
And THAT is why his house is now protected by ARMED guards from a company called, “OnSite”.
They wanna keep all reporters away and have him only talk to MGM’s lwuaaaayahaz (lawyers).
So was the guard shot inside or outside of the room?
If inside, was he inside for a period of time before the event?
Serves MGM right, after its pandering CEO offered to match any employee “donations” to BLM and SPLC after Charlottesville
Add MGM to your BOYCOTT List. What goes around . . .