To: Clutch Martin
#9 Clutch Martin wrote ~~~
Yes. HIPAA Act.
11 posted on
10/11/2017 2:33:48 PM PDT by
heterosupremacist
(Domine Iesu Christe, Filius Dei, miserere me peccatorem!)
To: heterosupremacist
Does HIPAA cover a pharmacist speaking generically (so to speak)? He didnt name any person or give personally identifying information. There are 535 Congressthings and 100 Senators and thousands of staffers. It’s a small city unto itself, so I doubt anyone could (or in this case would) bring any kind of complain or charges. But they can stop using his shop. I honestly can’t imagine why he’d say anything like that.
58 posted on
10/11/2017 3:54:11 PM PDT by
EDINVA
To: heterosupremacist
He's absolutely free to talk about the types of patients he serves, without mentioning names or specific identifying information. 'HIPAA' cannot prevent that.
Not the best business sense, though. He should have kept his mouth shut. He sounds like he's got (or had) a lucrative practice.
BTW, if I told you the number of medical professionals I have filled psychiatric medications for, you'd freak.
To: heterosupremacist; Clutch Martin
"
Yes. HIPAA Act."
What part of HIPAA did he violate?
79 posted on
10/11/2017 4:57:27 PM PDT by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson