The author is an idiot. His view of history stops at slavery and knows nothing of taxation, congressional maleficence by northern States, or the many other fights between the north and south that were happening at the time that had absolutely nothing to do with slavery.
His credibility is that of a liberal; an ignorant idiot.
The author is more likely to be a western intelligence asset, and as such quite adept at developing and disseminating false narratives.
If the goal were to inflame the situation, your reaction would be considered positive feedback.
The author is more likely to be a western intelligence asset, and as such quite adept at developing and disseminating false narratives.
If the goal were to inflame the situation, your reaction would be considered positive feedback.