Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Meet the New Boss
I don't see where the article you cite says Paddock rented 32-135 on the 25th and 32-134 on the 28th.

The link merely establishes that Paddock had possession of 32-134 at the relevant instant. The noise was loud. Someone in the room above 31-134 (for those of you in Rio Linda, that would be Room 32-134) was blazing away at a crowd of 22,000.

The conspiracy jerks have made much over the LVPD's screw-up over Paddock's check-in dates.

If you can provide any evidence the Aussie rented 32-134, other than his say-so, please post it!

169 posted on 10/09/2017 11:48:29 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: cynwoody
please post it!

I've been looking. I've been looking for anything official from LEO or MB that confirms just who booked 32-134, whether Paddock or Hodge.

I have not found anything. Press reports seem to just assume Paddock had both hotel rooms or else don't touch on it.

I did come across this, however: a supposed source who claimed to Laura Loomer that his girlfriend works at MB and that Paddock took connecting room 32-134 on the 28th.

If genuine, it is probably a better source than Hodge, and in that case he is just flat wrong about his room number. But still, we're going off anonymous stuff posted on a twitter feed.

174 posted on 10/10/2017 3:30:02 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson