Posted on 10/07/2017 3:38:12 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
When a scandal forces liberals to criticize both Hollywood and the Obamas, you know it’s bad.
Hollywood and Washington are both freaked out over a New York Times report about mega-producer Harvey Weinstein and allegations of sexual harassment over nearly three decades. Several liberals raised a key point: Wasn’t this the same producer that gave Malia Obama an internship at the Weinstein company? The Daily Beast also asked: If Hollywood knew about Weinstein’s supposed harassment, why didn’t they speak out against him?
Former New York Times writer Frank Rich, now executive producer for Veep, tweeted on October 6, “Biggest mystery of @nytimes Weinstein story: How exemplary parents like Obamas let their daughter work there. The stories were out there.” Yesterday, Bustle and Hollywood Reporter published articles talking about Malia Obama’s internship at the Weinstein company, which reportedly lasted from January to August of 2017.
Bustle went so far as to say, “This isn’t the first brush the Obamas have had with Weinstein. In 2011, Weinstein held a lavish, star-studded fundraiser for Obama’s 2012 presidential run at the exec's Westport, CT mansion, and donated over $28,500 indirectly to Obama’s 2008 campaign through the DNC and their White House Victory Fund.”
The Obamas have always been held up as “good parents” by the liberal media. If they were such great parents, it’s fair to ask why did they let their 18-year old daughter work for an alleged sexual predator for more than six months?
{..snip..}
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Because he wouldn’t have dared to try his tricks on the Presidents daughter?
‘Cause she gives good massages ?
She didn’t get the job because of her looks.
Blackmail?
Because they are all perverts? (just a hunch)
Because Weinstein "donated" the required amount to Obama's election campaign funds.
Brcause they were well paid
And the kid was usually too wasted by nightfall to even care
Obama doesn’t care. If Weinstein got some of his plant fertilizer into Malia, Obama knows how to reduce the burden.
Because they don’t care how they get what they need/want, as long as they get it.
Isn’t there something with Alinsky and his followers, like obama and the clintons, that states...the ends justify the means....or some other drivel like that.
Consider the possibility that his current troubles, after decades of predation without consequences, might be because he DID think he could get away with doing his thing with Malia?
MONEY!!!!!
Don’t forget Obama’s icky “Pops” poem.
Malaria ping.
Because it’s doubtful her internship brought her anywhere near Harvey Weinstein and even if it had, Weinstein would know better than to dare try anything with an ex-president’s daughter. Guys like him prey on helpless girls who need him to get ahead in the movie industry or who are afraid of what he can do to his careers. Malia Obama would be like plutonium to a predator like that.
More likely that Malia was not his type.
Obama always obeys his masters. Weinstein got what Obama owed him.
Especially with Malia’s armed SS detail accompanying her.
It’s good to be president!
You can benefit from the pervs donations & be comfortable he won’t assault your daughter.
Win. Win.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.