Posted on 10/07/2017 9:38:42 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Are they imposing the death penalty on those who us “they” or “their” when referring to one person, rather than a group?
Watch Dem Words
So, to avoid being incarcerated in Kalifornia, you would always use the word, “it,” to be safe.
Right?
5.56mm
I believe it must be the pronoun of that persons choosing. I'm not an "it" I'm an attack helicopter I'm notifying the authorities.
LOL.
You’re probably right.
5.56mm
Kind of fun to think up ridiculous names and titles that would be impossible to pronounce, then sue.
"My name is Marquis K-pax- gamma, emphasis on the octothorpe, and you called me mar-kee, it's mar-quiz!"
More proof that California’s liberal lunatic lawmakers are a bunch of fags, pimps, whores, queers, dykes and chimps. Did I get all the “approved” lingo right?
“What are you in for, bro?”
“Misuse of gender pronouns.”
Henceforth, my chosen pronoun is “His Exhaled and Esteemed Royal Majesty”
They may be billions and billions in debt, but doggonnit they’re going to make sure the pervs vegging in care centers get some respect.
Walking in darkness.
You must call a tail a leg now. Or jail for you says the Queen of Hearts.
Time for the Queen to lose HER head.
No No No - the “e” is the beginning of “expialidocious”....
No k - and that’s why your spell check doesn’t like it....
or looked at another way:
Supercalifragilistic-expialidocious
supercalifragilistickexpialidocious
Hey you
And
Would you please get it a drink of water
Solved.
“It’s not free speech when you’re in a contractual situation, which it is in this case, since you are in a licensed institution as an employee. As stupid as the law is it will probably hold up under judicial review.”
Oh yes it is free speech. The employer can fire them in a contractual situation, but the government may not arrest and imprison them for violating that contract.
The People’s Republic of California is f-—ed up beyond recognition.
.
>> “It’s not free speech when you’re in a contractual situation, which it is in this case, since you are in a licensed institution as an employee. As stupid as the law is it will probably hold up under judicial review.” <<
Bullshit!
Wishful thinking on your part.
.
A business license does not magically mean the employer can have the employee arrested for saying something like “he” instead of “she”. At most it means they can fire them.
In all actuality, holding a license probably makes you MORE liable not to violate civil rights.
GMTA, your post makes a point brought up many times, and further exposes the hypocrisy of the patchwork Left.
That would be nice, but it’s something I’d believe when I see given rulings over the last few years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.