To: familyop
Do we have proof the shooter used a bump stock?
3 posted on
10/05/2017 1:59:23 PM PDT by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: jeffc
Do we have proof the shooter used a bump stock? Do we care? Banning objects because evil people misuse them is stupid.
5 posted on
10/05/2017 2:00:48 PM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: jeffc
Do we have proof the shooter used a bump stock?
Not only that, but even if he did, do we have proof that banning bump stocks would have had any impact on the shooter's ability to do what he did?
8 posted on
10/05/2017 2:03:22 PM PDT by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: jeffc
Do we have proof the shooter used a bump stock? Nope, not a shred of evidence. This is politicians (democrats, republicans) taking advantage of a tragedy to whittle away at our gun rights, plain and simple.
And the NRA is selling its members down the river. This is why I'm glad I've NEVER joined the NRA. Every single NRA member ought to demand their dues back.
9 posted on
10/05/2017 2:03:36 PM PDT by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: jeffc
Do we have proof the shooter used a bump stock? Yes, we do have proof. So what? I'm still not for banning them.
11 posted on
10/05/2017 2:05:26 PM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: jeffc
"Do we have proof the shooter used a bump stock?"
Which shooter?
;-)
24 posted on
10/05/2017 2:34:39 PM PDT by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson