Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

All those years, 1962-1985, they told us they ONLY wanted to register and ban handguns. “Rifles and shotguns will not be affected!”

Then they went after rifles.


41 posted on 10/05/2017 11:17:45 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

The antigun movement really revved up after the JFK assassination. First, it was about banning “mail order murder” as LBJ called it. Then GCA-68 act passed but only because of the RFK & MLK assassinations. Three liberals, BTW.

First handguns...then “assault weapons”. Making mental health a factor in controlling gun ownership is the most insidious attempt yet; it invites Soviet-style arbitrariness over who gets to decide who is mentally ill.

The tide is always coming in...


50 posted on 10/05/2017 11:28:46 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

The appropriate response to Schumer is:

“The right to own and bear firearms is guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution.” If you wish to deny or limit a right the Constitution provides for an amendment process. I suggest if you are serious about denying citizens their rights you begin working through the amendment process.”


55 posted on 10/05/2017 11:39:14 AM PDT by Soul of the South (The past is gone and cannot be changed. Tomorrow can be a better day if we work on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson