Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zeugma

We agree that it’s not a tenable solution.

Again, I think the best we can do at this point is move to more complex alphanumeric SSNs.


82 posted on 10/04/2017 12:17:33 PM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeWarrior
Again, I think the best we can do at this point is move to more complex alphanumeric SSNs.

Just making it a hexadecimal number would increase space available for assignment. You can't make the number much larger though, as we know that it is difficult for folks to remember more than 7 digits. That's why the number is typically broken up the way it is. It makes it much easier to remember in chunks (yeah there are other reasons as well). Nine is actually pushing the limits of what the average person can easily deal with. I would really like to see it expanded to a 10 digit hex number anyway, with the last 'number' being a binary check bit. That would give us 68,719,476,735 plus a check bit. That should be enough for a while.

86 posted on 10/04/2017 12:50:21 PM PDT by zeugma (I live in the present due to the constraints of the Space-Time Continuum. —Hank Green)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson