Posted on 10/02/2017 1:43:35 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
The Internal Revenue Service was involved in a $5 million push to pressure Americans to buy Obamacare coverage, according to documents obtained from the watchdog group Judicial Watch.
Under former president Obama, the Department of Health and Human Services and the White House's Behavioral Sciences Team created a $5 million program to target and pressure those who refused Obamacare and either decided to pay a penalty instead or were exempt from being forced to purchase coverage.
"Attached are drafts of the letters that IRS will send to selected taxpayers who paid a penalty for failure to have coverage or who claimed an exemption from the coverage requirement for tax year 2015," said Janet McCubbin, director of individual taxation at the IRS. "As you know, we are planning to send several different versions of the letter to see which types of messages work best."
To craft and develop these letters, the IRS spent an estimated $5 million.
{..snip..}
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
Obamacare was passed based on a lie, a hoax - Grubered.
Why does the GOP want to fix a lie, a hoax?
Is communism in America good?
Are we good communists?
Do we like government control?
Progressive Income Tax
Government/Public Schools
Government Healthcare
Central/Government Bank
and others...
Answer: Because they're in on it.
Oh good, just a little state coercion to get with the Socialist program.
Where have we have heard that before?
IRS Commissioner Koskinen will finish his term in November. Hope the administration has a suitable replacement.
FIRE THEM. then block any further attempts.
My health insurance policy was just cancelled. Fourth year in a row, four different companies. None left in my area. So,I guess I am supposed to do without.
What I have to sau on this to thiS IRS and other Purveyors of the idea, is unprintable.
As far as I cant tell,the IRS is stilling being run by Obama era fidiots.
Trump’s 1st Ex. Order Gutted IRS Enforcement of Obamacare, 1472
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]." —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." —me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." —me
Corrections, insights welcome.
Patriots need to pink-slip as many incumbent members of Congress as they can in the 2018 elections, replacing them with state sovereignty-respecting patriots who will support Pres. Trump’s vision for MAGA.
New patriots lawmakers need to commit to supporting MAGA within the fed’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, petitioning the states for new constitutional powers if necessary.
In the meanwhile, patriots need to make sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting patriots on the primary ballots.
“Corrections, insights welcome.”
I just wanna know where your normal disclaimer is... jk
Good post as usual, thanks.
DOn’t waste your time sending me one, I will NOT enroll for any reason.
And once you are in - good luck getting out!
but I may have to do a lil research....
Term limits is the only answer. Must begin at the state level because Congress will never do it.
Still on the hook for the "penalty" for not having insurance?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.