Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wbill
That is my main argument too. Funny no one, no one ever addresses this obvious point. Would energy production have to double, triple? I have no idea and no one has answers. The largest electricity producer is natural gas. LOL. So we burn more of one fossil fuel to save on another. Or do some really believe renew-ables will replace natural gas? Please tell me no one really believes that?

Looking the other day at the octane of gas at the station, and the higher the octane, the lower amount of ethanol is in it. Has to tell you something about the quality of ethanol.

208 posted on 10/03/2017 12:17:59 PM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: matt04; Sam Gamgee; DoughtyOne; Red Badger; Deplorable American1776; Jim Noble; Paul R.; All

Let’s hear it for “rage” and snow. ;-) Seriously, more energy produced in US and not imported from troubled areas is a good thing. Nevertheless, it is harder to get uniformity in a multi focus industrial environment than in a state run operation. On the other hand multi focus leads to more creativity and competition. If industry could get something like thread screw size right (see my Comment 229) then many other solutions are also possible with cross industry cooperation on the essentials. How about a National Electric Power Utilization Commission or something like that?


232 posted on 10/04/2017 1:20:34 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson