Let's face the fact that Muslims are dangerous, dysfunctional, and demogagues.
They even sexually attack mannequins.
Posted on 10/01/2017 5:53:29 AM PDT by C19fan
Do these “Asian Men” have decent “take out”?
A millennium of inbreeding and what do you expect?
Where is the attack by Hilary and other western feminists against women who just "do what their husbands tell them" [like the attack on women who vote for Trump], and against the culture that promotes this moral and religious absolution and vindication for abusing women.
The hypocrisy among the ctr-left runs deep and strong.
Let's face the fact that Muslims are dangerous, dysfunctional, and demogagues.
They even sexually attack mannequins.
Asian = British speak for a Muslim
The only thing these muzzies in the U.K. want to “take out” are the white native born English, Welsh, and Scottish.
They are using “Asian” to describe Middle Easterners, who are actually Caucasian—hence, the same “race” as Europeans—the main difference being that Europeans have a Christian background, and Middle Easterners have a Muslim background.
My impression of actual Asians is that they are civilized people. South Korea and Japan are completely modern civilizations, and I certainly did not feel unsafe when I visited Korea.
>> Asian = British speak for a Muslim <<
Exactly why my Vietnamese wife insists that she’s an Oriental not an Asian.
If I ever referred to her as Asian, she’d smack me upside the head.
Asian = British speak for people from Indian subcontinent.
and that would be a loving knock.
And yet we're told that "oriental" is a racist, insulting, and politically incorrect term.
It is so difficult keeping the think-speak straight...
Never mind. Once you think you have the Newspeak/Thinkspeak correct, they will move the goalposts.
Pakistanis—the main problem in the UK—are Caucasians from way back, but also Muslim. And, that’s the prime component of the English version of “Asian.”
I agree that Koreans, Japanese, and Chinese are more socially civilized in general (war behavior of the Japanese being an exception) than the typical Paki Asian.
What is with moozlums? For the most part they are uncivilized loons. If they just remained in their crappy countries being such weirdos (and just murdered each other) who would care? Mainly, they would be something to avoid. What a sick, uncivilized crappy “culture”.
Objects are Oriental, not people.
Meh. Oriental was a perfectly useful term here in the U.S. used to describe the peoples of East Asia who generally have an epicanthic fold. The Brits still use the term to mean this, the last I looked, and use “Asian” to describe someone from the Indian subcontinent.
The term has been ruined by leftist political correctness for political reasons.
And further, see BuffaloJack’s post in #9.
Asian is politically correct BritSpeak for Pakistani (muslim), especially in the context of crime. They do it to conflate Pakistanis with Indians (Hindus) so the reader doesnt know for sure that the perp in question is muslim.
“My impression of actual Asians is that they are civilized people. South Korea and Japan are completely modern civilizations, and I certainly did not feel unsafe when I visited Korea.”
I might even be wiling today to visit S. Korea, Japan, and China. As far as the Mideast is concerned, I’d pay a lot to avoid visiting any of that hideous part of the world.
My mother always used the term oriental so I did also. I just found out a few years ago it was racist. Hard to keep up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.