Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zipper
It was a lot ‘more illegal’ before, since you could be nailed both for DUI and for possession.

Only if it was the norm among those DingUI to also be possessing - another unsupported and suspect claim.

36 posted on 09/29/2017 11:08:02 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: NobleFree

Well of course many more were — and I don’t have to prove it was the “norm” at all — the point is it was previously more of a disincentive to carry your stash with you when it was illegal. Now it isn’t.

Analagously, if it’s illegal to possess a weapon while driving your vehicle then it makes more sense that if it were made legal more people would carry weapons in their vehicle. No need to prove the “norm” of how many carried in their vehicle prior to the new law.


37 posted on 09/29/2017 12:02:45 PM PDT by zipper (In their heart of hearts, every Democrat is a communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson