There’s a great deal of sense in this article, but I doubt it will get much attention. The Sexual Revolution promised people lives is joy and freedom through the indulgence of genital appetite, with no limiting factor other than “consent.” Lots of women believed it. Now, when their sexual activity results in their feeling exploited, violated, or revolted, they don’t reason that the premises they were taught are completely wrong. Instead, they reason that they must not have “consented,” even if it seems like they did.
https://acculturated.com/feminists-equating-bad-hookup-sex-assault/
This article discussed the same points. The “feminists” aren’t totally wrong, because the misery is real. However, it’s not caused by lack of “consent.” It’s caused by sinning against nature and nature’s God.
Well said, Tax-chick.
Sexual promiscuity is against Natural Law, which is an academic way of saying it’s against our inbuilt nature. And our inbuilt natural gift of reason would tell us so, if we cared to employ our reason! Then we’d know that boundary-less sexual behavior impede human flourishing on the level of the individual, the family, and across generations.
Natural Law -— made by God, Nature’s Author -— being part of the structure of reality, can’t be canceled, no more than you could cancel the Law of Gravity.