If the “models” were any good, they could be initialized to the conditions of 1917, run to generate a 100-year forecast, and that forecast would match the actual historical record of the last century.
If the Warmists could do that, they would already have done it and be shouting the results from the rooftops.
The fact that they haven’t done it proves they can’t do that, and that their models are all bunk.
Models are models, and not facts. Other influences, such as volcanoes in recent decades can influence things. For example in the charts posted by FYC, you can see a drop in temps after 1980 and 1990. I believe there were several very ashy volcanoes shortly after 1980, and Pinatubo in 1991 was definitely followed by severe winter weather for several years in the NE US. I particularly remember a severe ice storm that was breaking off trees and telephone poles in NY state and Canada. My brother who was living in Syracuse was very impressed by that and he had lived there since the mid 1960’s. Should we have a monster like Toba, or even Tambora, our risk of temp rise would be nil for a century or a decade. The climate models simply cannot include that kind of conjecture.