Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Court Ruling Guts Police Ability To Use Guns
dailycaller.com ^ | 9/20/17 | Anders Hagstrom

Posted on 09/20/2017 12:03:00 PM PDT by ColdOne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: fwdude
So, now they have to take a knife to a knife fight?

No, it means that police should be held to the same standard as Joe Q. Citizen when determining whether the use of deadly force was justified under the circumstances.

21 posted on 09/20/2017 12:48:45 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Will that be predetermined before they hit the scene?

When dealing with a dangerous, armed criminal, ‘If you snooze, you loose’


22 posted on 09/20/2017 12:49:18 PM PDT by windowdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
A federal appeals court in Seattle ruled Tuesday that police can only use force “proportional” to the threat they face

Right. Let the criminals determine the terms of engagement.
23 posted on 09/20/2017 12:50:51 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glasseye
>>Maybe it just means the cops don’t get to shoot you 30 times for holding a butter knife.<<

Just throwing this out there. So, a fella standing twenty or so feet from an officer that has his weapon drawn, beaded on the suspect holding a knife....why can't the cop pop a cap in the guyz thigh? Perhaps a couple.

Would this not halt the threat? Is it really necessary to take someones life when it can be avoided? I realize not every situation fits this scenario, but I've seen a few videos where officers killed a person holding a knife...and they really didn't have to.

I know there are those folks that will come at me with...whah whah whah, dah cop wants to go home too-woo-woo.

Psssst! newsflash, not every cop is a straight arrow folks. There is about 10% of every segment of society that are bad apples. Even law enforcement.

24 posted on 09/20/2017 12:55:40 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Well considering they gunned down an unarmed Downs Syndrome guy in a movie because he wanted to see the movie again and didn’t have a ticket. He was with a caregiver as well. The guy was on the very edge of DS towards the childlike.


25 posted on 09/20/2017 12:56:54 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
"Let the criminals determine the terms of engagement. "

A perennially favorite tactic of the political left.

Aiding and abetting the criminal class from the bench. As if that made it legit.

26 posted on 09/20/2017 12:58:23 PM PDT by Joe Brower ( Les deplorables sont victorieux!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
...it means that police should be held to the same standard as Joe Q. Citizen...

Not really. With the absence of malice laws, unless an officer says "I hate kikes" before he offs somebody, he's not going to jail.

This does tighten some procedural rules, and more officers may be fired than now.

Cops have brought this on themselves. They have consistently and repeatedly protected the bad actors in their midst.

27 posted on 09/20/2017 1:06:53 PM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I keep waiting for an entire city police force to quit. Just walk off the job and tell the mayor and/or city council that if they are not given the power to enforce the law, then the mayor and the city council can take over.


28 posted on 09/20/2017 1:10:37 PM PDT by Yulee (Village of Albion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

So these brave judges will be on the streets, enforcing laws now? Refuse to comply.


29 posted on 09/20/2017 1:10:49 PM PDT by WKUHilltopper (WKU 2016 Boca Raton Bowl Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I see a real opportunity for nunchuk and throwing-star trainers...


30 posted on 09/20/2017 1:15:25 PM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
As a citizen I can only use deadly force when I am in fear of death or great bodily harm or I fear for the life (or bodily harm) of another person. I don't want police forces to be using "unreasonable" deadly force when its not necessary. The problem with poorly worded law or regulation is it can be interpreted in many ways.

Yup. The rules should be the same for police as any other citizen.

31 posted on 09/20/2017 1:22:06 PM PDT by zeugma (I live in the present due to the constraints of the Space-Time Continuum. —Hank Green)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
You apparently didn't read the opinion. Police now must use "commensurate" force against someone who is a threat. That means that if the attacker is using threats, the police can only use threats. If the attacker is using a knife, the police have to use knives.

Force with like force doesn't win any battles.

32 posted on 09/20/2017 1:25:10 PM PDT by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

The rule on center of mass shooting was created because in most immediate danger situations shooting at a moving target and hitting the target are 2 different things. Watch the knife videos about having 3 seconds at 20 feet to live if the knifeman wants you dead and thats if you have your gun pointed.


33 posted on 09/20/2017 1:41:01 PM PDT by bdfromlv (Leavenworth hard time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Rocks, bottles, and batteries at a riot?


34 posted on 09/20/2017 1:42:00 PM PDT by motor_racer (Who will bell the cat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bdfromlv

Yes. All should watch the videos showing how quickly a person with a knife can cross 20 feet and kill you, or a cop, before you or the cop can draw a weapon. Or use the weapon you are already holding in your hand.

I believe we must give our police certain powers of escalation.


35 posted on 09/20/2017 1:54:23 PM PDT by mbarker12474
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

No, because the knife is a deadly weapon and so is a gun.

You can’t use a deadly weapon for a non-deadly threat, nor can you use it a non-deadly manner i.e. shoot to would. Either the threat is great enough to justify deadly force or it’s not, there is no middle ground.

Because if we allow cops to shoot to wound, some of those victims will invariably die and lawsuits will follow. Worse if shoot to wound was a standard, eventually cops will be shooting to wound non-deadly threats. It would create legal quicksand that would mire law enforcement in endless litigation over every weapon use.


36 posted on 09/20/2017 2:05:21 PM PDT by Valpal1 (I am grown weary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

What was wrong with the slogan:

“Some people just need killin’”?


37 posted on 09/20/2017 2:14:43 PM PDT by Oscar in Batangas (12:01 PM 1/20/2017...The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
...why can't the cop pop a cap in the guyz thigh? Perhaps a couple.

Even better, shoot the knife out of their hand. Then keep shooting the knife making it skitter down the street out of the perp's reach. Maybe even turn their backs on the perps and use a hand mirror to aim.

38 posted on 09/20/2017 2:28:11 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Having seen Cops qualify at a range, I would venture to say center mass at 20 feet would be hard enough for many Cops to hit on a moving target.


39 posted on 09/20/2017 2:36:27 PM PDT by Paperpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

“So, now they have to take a knife to a knife fight?”

No, but now they can’t call it ‘reasonable force’ when they shoot someone for recording them on a cell phone.


40 posted on 09/20/2017 2:43:38 PM PDT by MeganC (Democrat by birth, Republican by default, conservative by principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson