No; but you *might* get 40 years for shooting at the conv store when the story is that you are pissed off at something else. The problem; that act screams “out of control, with a gun, danger to society.” At least to me, it does. I’m not advocating one thing or another, but I could see a judge finding maximum alarm from such an act.
Yes, but at the minimum he would have a disturbed emotional state defense. To me, it’s not clear what happened at the convenience store, or if he was charged with it.