[LS]

If you went through all the things DOJ has done, and must do on a daily basis, you’d stop this stuff.

Bannon told me “anyone who says ‘go out and arrest x’ doesn’t know what they’re talking about. It isn’t done that way.”

DOJ must have a solid, if not airtight evidence that it can convict, not just indict.

Trump has Sessions on trade policy (did you know he is de facto on all trade negotiations and all NSC meetings?), on current record levels of deportations, on patent infringements & China, then he had to do the DACA backgrounder, plus the cases he’s already brought against Medicare fraud, high levels of gang activities, and so on.

The “bribe” would be next to impossible to prove it was a bribe, especially from a Sec State.

Bannon had 100% confidence in Sessions and I do too. I think when some of you learn what he’s been doing-—all on a skeleton staff thanks to the Ds or with obstruction thanks to the never Trumpers, you’ll be sorry you ever criticized him.

[samtheman]

Bannon had 100% confidence in Sessions and I do too.

---

You use present tense for yourself and past tense for Bannon. Is that because Bannon is shifting on this subject or you just don’t know where he stands at the present time.

Anyway, thanks for your post. You have caused me to rethink all this.