“The little girl in question always tried to urinate standing up. She had no brothers. She did not see her father urinate. But at 3 years old she was peeing standing up, acting as if she had the equipment.”
To apply Occam’s razor, the simplest, most likely explanation is that she did see a man urinating. Knowledge of other cases leads one to wonder if the man she saw urinating molested her, which could account for her masculine traits.
Yes, I’m speculating, but what more likely explanation is there? Decades of desperate searching have failed to turn up a sodomite gene.
A girl who wants to pee standing up even though she has never seen a penis or a man standing up to pee is unlikely in the extreme. What possible explanation could there be for that? It is much more likely that she did see a man.
I’m not saying it’s a sodomite gene. I’m saying that from birth this child looked and acted masculine. She still does.
Logical reasoning. Unfortunately, it is not a tool readily available to everyone.