Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim 0216
A tyrant would never and could never restore the Constitution as it would be that tyrant’s own demise

I should have qualified the tyrant as a "good" tyrant. Washington could have been King for life but chose not to be, their could be another honest man no matter how rare.

89 posted on 09/16/2017 2:37:49 PM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: itsahoot

Well, I know of no such thing as a man that is a “good tyrant” just as I know of no such thing as a government that has “good tyranny”. Both sooner or later rip their mask off to show the wolf hiding behind sheep’s clothing.

They wanted Washington to be such a tyrant and he refused. Washington was not a tyrant “good” or otherwise. OTOH, FDR is an example of a “beloved” tyrant whose unconstitutional acts (the definition of tyranny) created the $4 trillion mostly unconstitutional federal government monster that we have today. FDR wasn’t a “good” tyrant - he was a Marxist that stole our freedoms and created a monster.

No, it will be freedom lovers at the state and federal level who will need to step up and undo the damage of the likes of FDR, Obama, and the Lying Left.


90 posted on 09/16/2017 2:50:11 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson