Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada Charged Six Times As Much As US Navy for Super Hornets
Defense-Aerospace.com ^ | Sept 14, 2017 | Giovanni de Briganti

Posted on 09/14/2017 7:04:48 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

PARIS --- The US government has offered Canada a batch of Super Hornet fighters at a price that is six times higher than the US Navy is paying for the same aircraft, analysis of official US documents reveals.

It is generally understood that the cost of combat aircraft varies according to the amount of options, ancillary equipment, spares and weapons included in the package.

However, as in all commercial transactions, prices depend on the buyer. Prices are also sometimes manipulated to influence prospective buyers to take a given course of action.

This appears to be the case with the US government’s Sept. 12 offer of 18 Boeing Super Hornet fighters to Canada, which is looking for a small number of interim fighters whereas Washington would much prefer that it buy the Lockheed Martin F-35A without bothering to compete the program.

This may be one reason for the sky-high sticker price Canada is being asked to pay – three to six times as much as the US Navy is paying for the same aircraft.

Canada offered dissuasive price

On September 12, Canada was quoted a cost of $5.23 billion for 10 fully-equipped F/A-18E single-seat and eight F/A-18F two-seater Super Hornet aircraft with their support equipment, some spares and other services.

These 18 fighters would thus end up costing Canada $290.6 million each in acquisition alone.

However, according to the Pentagon’s FY17 budget, current production F-18 cost the US Navy $81.5 million each – three-and-a-half times less than the price quoted to Canada.

In a separate contract released on Sept. 13, the Pentagon announced that the US Navy will actually paying $676.6 million for six F/A-18E and eight F/A-18F aircraft, or $48.3 million each for the Lot 41 aircraft it is buying in this financial year (see below.)

It is worth noting that the price offered to Canada on Sept. 12 is almost exactly six times the price paid by the US Navy for the latest Super Hornets it ordered Sept. 13.

Some will rightly note that the price offered to Canada includes a lot of support equipment, spares and services that are not included in the US Navy order, as they are bought separately.

It is questionable, however, that this ancillary equipment could cost five times as much as the aircraft themselves.

Kuwait offered bigger package at lower unit price

At this stage, it is interesting to look at another proposed Super Hornet sale, this time to Kuwait, that the US Defense Security and Cooperation Agency submitted to Congress on Nov. 17, 2016.

Kuwait requested thirty-two F/A-18Es and eight F/A-18F aircraft, with a spares and weapons package twice as big as Canada’s, which the United States agreed to supply for $10.1 billion. This works out to about $252 million per aircraft, or five times as much as what the US Navy is paying.

So, in a same financial year, the range of F-18 unit prices can actually vary by a factor of six, according to the customer.

Conclusion: caveat emptor

Two main lessons can be drawn from this brief analysis.

The most obvious one is the prices paid by the Pentagon for its military aircraft does not provide a credible indication as to the prices paid by foreign customers. For this year’s Super Hornet, the range is one to six.

But, in 2013, Australia was offered 12 Super Hornets and 12 EA-18G Growlers (a more expensive electronic attack variant) for only $3.7 billion (or $154 million each -- about half of what Canada is being asked to pay today.

A second lesson should attract the attention of all the countries that have signed onto the F-35 program believing the informal promise that its unit cost would be of about $85 million per copy.

We have already demonstrated that the F-35’s costs are being manipulated. But the example of how F-18 costs are boosted to multiples of what the Pentagon is paying for the same aircraft offers a cautionary tale to F-35 buyers.

Even assuming that the F-35’s price drops to $85 million a copy for the US, applying the same cost escalation model as for the Super Hornet indicates that export F-35s could end up costing six times as much, or about $510 million each, once spares, support equipment, training and weapons are added.

But, in fact, it could get even worse.

If a factor of six is used for the Super Hornet, an aircraft that is in its 41st year of full-rate production, what additional costs will be added to the F-35, an aircraft so technically troubled that it is still in development 16 years after the Joint Strike Fighter program was launched?

-ends-


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; boeing; canada; rcaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2017 7:04:48 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

If we developed and produced in USA. IF they don’t like it they better be willing to shell out even more millions to get their own military industrial complex going.


2 posted on 09/14/2017 7:11:34 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bayard

That’s right; they outsourced the R&D to us decades ago, so they should pay.


3 posted on 09/14/2017 7:13:43 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Interesting stuff, as usual...I wasn’t aware US defense contractors had such pricing flexibility with foreign sales. I seem to recall Russia selling fighter aircraft without such markups.

I would like to respond to the last line of the article though:

“If a factor of six is used for the Super Hornet, an aircraft that is in its 41st year of full-rate production, what additional costs will be added to the F-35, an aircraft so technically troubled that it is still in development 16 years after the Joint Strike Fighter program was launched?”

The article seemed to be theorizing at the beginning that the F/A-18 pricing was high to encourage uptake of the F-35. I’d guess that partner nations have already been guaranteed F-35 prices/markups? Does anyone know or have a link?

At any rate, the “troubled” F-35 program seems on the verge of providing world-class aircraft, and the only mass-produced stealthy fighter (we’ll see how China’s efforts go, but they’re clearly not ready for prime time now). The F-35B in particular is an awesome accomplishment, it was great seeing four of them them flying and dropping weapons in South Korea alongside the B-1 the other day. Semper Fi!


4 posted on 09/14/2017 7:18:03 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We make the product. In a capitalist society the owner and proprietor sets the price. I dont care that you dont like me charging others different prices for my product.

If you can meet your needs elsewhere, please do.


5 posted on 09/14/2017 7:26:37 AM PDT by Delta 21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Canada used up all the R&D budget on these. Now it's time to pay the piper.


6 posted on 09/14/2017 7:30:25 AM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well, at least the Canadians pay less for drugs developed in the US...


7 posted on 09/14/2017 7:33:01 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bayard

Price per unit depends on how many you buy.

USN buys a lot, therefore the average cost per unit is significantly less than what Canada is paying.

The jets to Canada are not just like the USN jets. There are FMS security deletions that have to be paid for (cost big bucks to change software codes on a very small number of jets), and the jets also have specific country codes in the software.

The writer of this piece has no idea about FMS and export restrictions/technology requirements.

Writer in an idiot.


8 posted on 09/14/2017 7:37:21 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Buy low, sell high, maneuver....
Usually it’s buy high, sell low with the Feds spending and/or giving away our money.


9 posted on 09/14/2017 7:38:05 AM PDT by Sasparilla ( I'm Not Tired of Winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

Oh, and Canada has to pay for non-recurring research and development costs for “their” jets.


10 posted on 09/14/2017 7:38:56 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

Please see Posts 10 & 8.


11 posted on 09/14/2017 7:39:56 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Good. Charge them whatever. The hosers rely on US defense anyway.


12 posted on 09/14/2017 7:40:22 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We can always sweeten the deal by giving them a few million of our illegal immigrants.


13 posted on 09/14/2017 7:42:36 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“This appears to be the case with the US government’s Sept. 12 offer of 18 Boeing Super Hornet fighters to Canada”

Ok, since when does the US Government set the price of a Boeing product? And if Boeing sets the price, then why would Boeing set the price at a point to encourage the buyer to go get the Lockheed product instead?

I’m thinking there are a lot of leaps of faith in this article.


14 posted on 09/14/2017 8:01:12 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Canada is being asked to pay – three to six times as much as the US Navy is paying for the same aircraft. “

Three to six times?
That kind of hole leads one to discount the theory.


15 posted on 09/14/2017 8:02:33 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rinnwald

In 1952 that was a _very_ good interceptor for defense of Canada from bombers. Fast climb, fast speed for the day, long range. Canada had a very good aircraft industry and still does. But its a fact we put them under tremendous pressure to buy US products when NORAD was the thing.


16 posted on 09/14/2017 8:10:52 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Trudeau will love it ,he can’t wait to waste tons of money


17 posted on 09/14/2017 8:30:03 AM PDT by butlerweave (it's the children are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well first we have to paint a leaf on there and paint aint cheap. Then there is the cost of anti freeze, snow tires, and making the bitch’n Betty say, “Altitude eh! Pull up eh!”

These mods are expensive.


18 posted on 09/14/2017 9:03:59 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rinnwald
Nonsense! The used up their R&D budget on these:


19 posted on 09/14/2017 10:58:18 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

It was a very good but very specialized aircraft that no-one would buy. The Brits had their own ideas, and the Yanks straight out said they would not buy it.

Killed Avro, and most of the engineers went to Texas and Florida to work for NACA/NASA. We know how that worked out...


20 posted on 09/14/2017 11:33:59 AM PDT by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson