Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Traces of xenon detected in S. Korea following N. Korea's nuke test
Yonhap News ^ | 2017/09/08

Posted on 09/09/2017 7:54:24 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Traces of xenon detected in S. Korea following N. Korea's nuke test

2017/09/08 20:01

SEOUL, Sept. 8 (Yonhap) -- Traces of xenon gas, a radionuclide, were detected in South Korea, the nuclear safety agency said Friday, five days after North Korea conducted its most powerful nuclear test.

The the radioactive material, the xenon-133 isotope, was found in the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission's analysis of ground, air and maritime samplings that were collected locally after the latest nuclear test by the North, according to the agency.

Defying international warnings, North Korea conducted its sixth and most powerful yet nuclear test Sunday, claiming it was a hydrogen bomb that can be loaded atop an intercontinental ballistic missile.

The detected amount measures 0.43 milibecquerel per cubic meter or 0.03 mBq/㎥, according to the analysis.

The agency is currently tracking down the inflow of the material to conclude whether it is a result of the nuclear test.

The agency added, however, that the amount would not have any health effects as South Korea's background radiation currently remains at the usual level of 50-300 nanosieverts per hour.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nkorea; nucleartest; pawnofredchina; pawnofrussia; russianpawn; xenon133
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2017 7:54:24 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; Grampa Dave; ...

P!


2 posted on 09/09/2017 7:54:48 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Was it ‘Warren’s Xenon’?//


3 posted on 09/09/2017 8:06:35 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Xe-133 hugs the ground because of its density. Our floor detectors would go off when we had a cracked vial of it. I wonder how long it takes to travel from the blast site to the detectors in S. Korea?


4 posted on 09/09/2017 8:14:21 AM PDT by farming pharmer (www.sterlingheightsreport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"The detected amount measures 0.43 milibecquerel per cubic meter or 0.03 mBq/㎥, according to the analysis.

The agency added, however, that the amount would not have any health effects as South Korea's background radiation currently remains at the usual level of 50-300 nanosieverts per hour."

How convenient of them to give measurements in apples and oranges.

5 posted on 09/09/2017 8:17:42 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Well, we know one thing - This was not from a Hydrogen bomb!

The Xenon-133 isotope comes from the fission of Uranium-235!

So NK set off the normal run-of-the-mill NUK! Like the one set off at Hiroshima!


6 posted on 09/09/2017 8:28:30 AM PDT by TRY ONE (I never got the memo changing the name of Global Warming to Klimate Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The have probably tested for Xe-133 and Xe-135 and other isotopes. More here:

Xenon and Particulates: A Qualitative Discussion of Sensitivity to Nuclear Weapon Components and Design

https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/160121_dalnoki-veress_xenon_and_particulates.pdf


7 posted on 09/09/2017 8:28:56 AM PDT by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

But it was powerful.

Does that mean it was the size of a house?


8 posted on 09/09/2017 8:35:59 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (CNN IS ISIS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

But doesn’t an H-bomb use an A-bomb trigger?


9 posted on 09/09/2017 8:38:02 AM PDT by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

I think it converts to 188.34 nSv


10 posted on 09/09/2017 8:39:01 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
How convenient of them to give measurements in apples and oranges.

Not being a nuclear physicist nor having stayed at a Holiday Inn, I have to ask -- Is there a way to directly convert a concentration (mBq per cubic meter) value to a rate (nanosieverts per hour)?

11 posted on 09/09/2017 8:41:27 AM PDT by Bob (Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Hmmmm.

How did traces of any fission product end up hundreds of miles south of the test site where the prevailing winds have been strongly to the northeast since the blast????

Xenon-133 has a half-life of about 5 days, why are the trace amounts so low???

Xenon-133 would have been accompanied by many other fission byproducts, why aren’t they reported???

The Chinese and ourselves and Japan have been sniffing constantly downwind since the blast, but no reports from them???


12 posted on 09/09/2017 8:42:35 AM PDT by gandalftb (OK State, Go Cowboys!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob

https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/conversion_factors_rn.pdf


13 posted on 09/09/2017 8:45:12 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Nevermind, I think that is incorrect.


14 posted on 09/09/2017 8:46:34 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Thanks. I’ll check that out when I’m back on my computer rather than my phone.


15 posted on 09/09/2017 8:49:02 AM PDT by Bob (Damn, the democrats haven't been this upset since Republicans freed their slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

I heard that NK’s NUK Test was 5, or so, times the one set off at Hiroshima!

It only take 5-10 lbs. of U-235 to make a massive bomb!
And U-235 is made from centrifuges, starting with ‘Yellow Cake’ (normal uranium found in the ground).

Remember Einstein’s equation: E = MC2

Put in 5 lb of U-235 times the speed of light squared!

That’s a massive amount of energy!


16 posted on 09/09/2017 8:50:20 AM PDT by TRY ONE (I never got the memo changing the name of Global Warming to Klimate Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

The Norks use Plutonium.

It was likely a boosted fission blast, where an atomic bomb causes isotopes of hydrogen to fuse. So, it may have been a hybrid.


17 posted on 09/09/2017 8:54:28 AM PDT by gandalftb (OK State, Go Cowboys!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
How convenient of them to give measurements in apples and oranges.

The advantage of REM - no mili or micro or nano anything. 1 REM ok, but need to start being careful. 10 REM - that's more than you are allowed in a year; find another line of work. 50 REM - you're sick man. 100 REM - you could die. 500 REM, you're dead.

18 posted on 09/09/2017 8:54:32 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

I’ve read (here) that it was an “enhanced” or “two-stage”’fission nuke, not an true H-bomb. This would seem to confirm that.


19 posted on 09/09/2017 8:58:14 AM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

Actually only a fraction of the fission material (uranium or plutonium) is converted into energy. But it still results in a massive amount of energy!


20 posted on 09/09/2017 9:00:49 AM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson