To: sukhoi-30mki
Bunch of misogynistic patriarchal heteronormativists!
2 posted on
09/07/2017 10:21:45 PM PDT by
chris37
(Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
“Russia claims that the Tu-160 Blackjack super-sonic heavy bomber is the primary means to delivering this massive bomb, but...It is much more likely that an Il-76 cargo plane, or even the larger An-124, would carry the weapon to the target area...
“The Russians claim the bomb is guided by their own GLONASS satellite navigation system, similar to GPS, but this delivery profile strongly suggests the weapon is actually unguided.”
Well, what exactly ARE we supposed to believe about this?
3 posted on
09/07/2017 10:22:26 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I hope that the Russians killed a lot of koranimals.
4 posted on
09/07/2017 10:22:34 PM PDT by
WMarshal
(President Trump, a president keeping his promises to the American people. It feels like winning.)
To: sukhoi-30mki; All
Sure won’t get the transgender mother of all bombs out of that country.
5 posted on
09/07/2017 10:46:17 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I don’t believe it. It would have shown up as one heck of an earthquake.
6 posted on
09/07/2017 10:55:35 PM PDT by
Revel
To: sukhoi-30mki
Good place for a battlefield test
Syria seems close to cleaning out this area with the aid of the Russian Air Force
7 posted on
09/07/2017 11:14:24 PM PDT by
silverleaf
(We voted for change, not leftover change)
To: sukhoi-30mki
No mention of weapon used, but RT are just reporting “Russian airstrike destroys bunker [underground command center] with senior ISIS commanders near Deir ez-Zor” which would tally.
8 posted on
09/07/2017 11:53:10 PM PDT by
Mr Radical
(In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act)
To: sukhoi-30mki
“At the same time, the use of this weapon doesn’t damage or pollute the environment.” This one statement made me doubt the entire article. A J school grad must have written this article.
12 posted on
09/08/2017 12:44:17 AM PDT by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
To: sukhoi-30mki
They should drop one of those fuel air bombs on the next hurricane that develops out in the Atlantic...
...a large explosion right in the eye of the storm may knock it out.
17 posted on
09/08/2017 3:57:00 AM PDT by
exPBRrat
(.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Is theirs bigger then our Mother of all bombs? Is there anything bigger, like maybe a Grandfather of all bombs?
To: sukhoi-30mki
"...the use of this weapon doesn’t damage or pollute the environment.” It's an air burst (or surface burst) weapon, correct? It's gonna put tons of stuff into the atmosphere that wasn't there before.
Sounds like "pollution" to me.
To: sukhoi-30mki
If FOAB and MOAB had a child, I would like to see it.
26 posted on
09/08/2017 7:49:30 AM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
(Kill: Antifa, SPLC, CNN, ESPN, NFL, NPR, TWITTER, FACEBOOK)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Mickey Mouse story, no proof of this.
28 posted on
09/11/2017 7:45:51 AM PDT by
BeadCounter
(You have just entered a no-Russian Troll Zone)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson