Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ProtectOurFreedom
...Wouldn’t it make more sense to increase the missile range by 230 miles and skip the drone entirely? This doesn’t add up.

It actually makes more sense to skip the F-15 or F-16 and let the drone do most of the work.

The drones are expendable and carry a few missiles. Something like an AWACS finds targets and cues the drones, which swarm the target and fire missiles.

If no targets are found, the drones return to base for refueling and a new mission. No pilots to get shot down and captured.

10 posted on 09/07/2017 11:04:33 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: CurlyDave

I don’t think the drones would ever return to base. If the fighter flew just 200 miles out from base the drone shouldn’t have enough range to return home. So they must expected to be 100% expendable. Avoiding the requirement to take off and land greatly and avoiding pilot life support requirements reduces the strength requirement for the drone airframe reducing weight a lot, but you still have highly limited range and very high parasitic drag on the fighter. If the fighter came under attack and had to skedaddle, the first thing it would have to do would be jettison the drone(s).

The autonomous swarming concept has promise, but it seems like you wouldn’t have much of a swarm if each mother fighter carried only one drone. With a 1:1 ratio mother:drone, your drone swarm is only as large as the number of fighters you launch.


15 posted on 09/08/2017 3:30:34 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson