Replies

"...when the shooting starts there is no reason to shoot him."

Other than the fact that he was a masked accomplice to the armed robber, I concur.

70 posted on 09/07/2017 11:57:34 AM PDT by Hugh the Scot ("The days of being a keyboard commando are over. It's time to get some bloody knuckles." -Drew68)

Other than the fact that he was a masked accomplice to the armed robber, I concur.

If he does not pose a deadly threat you better not shoot him.

You can take solace that when they catch him they will charge him with first degree murder for the death of his thug friend.

Personally, I would rather he go to jail for that than I go to jail for an unjustified shoot.

You could say that you thought he was armed because his partner was armed. You might get away with it but it is better not to take the chance if he is unarmed.

72 posted on 09/07/2017 12:26:07 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.L)