I'm pretty sure I got it right. I said
Why should any mother fear for her son’s life because he works in a store and is forced by the government to be unarmed?
Meaning: If I work in a state that forbids concealed carry, my mother would worry about me working in a liquor store because it is a magnet for armed robbery and I am defenseless.
The man in the picture is advocating for gun control so that the mothers of armed robbers don’t have to worry for the lives of their no-good sons.
Seems pretty straight forward to me. Where is the confusion?
By the way; it’s 5 o’clock somewhere ;)