Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bratch

The First Amendment rights recognized for the media should also be recognized for individual citizens.

If an individual citizen had video-recorded a conversation with Harris and posted it on YouTube, the police would have long since removed the recording from the citizen, and tasered him if necessary, with barely more than a quick warrant.


12 posted on 09/05/2017 12:28:16 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carl Vehse

You raise an excellent point. Technology has forever blurred the line between “the media” and everyone else.

We are all Journalists now.


15 posted on 09/05/2017 12:31:06 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Carl Vehse
The First Amendment rights recognized for the media should also be recognized for individual citizens.

If an individual citizen had video-recorded a conversation with Harris and posted it on YouTube, the police would have long since removed the recording from the citizen, and tasered him if necessary, with barely more than a quick warrant.

Absolutely agreed on both points. The media shouldn't get any special privileges. Who is, and is not designated as "media" is completely arbitrary and subjective.

20 posted on 09/05/2017 1:30:42 PM PDT by zeugma (I live in the present due to the constraints of the Space-Time Continuum. —Hank Green)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson