Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Williams
I read differently. We do not WANT to annihilate N. Korea but we have many options to do so.

Of course we don't WANT to do it but may not have a choice in the matter.

52 posted on 09/03/2017 1:04:36 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76

I read it as we won’t do anything militarily unless he actually attacks. In other words, we won’t do anything militarily while North Korea spends the coming years building up a huge nuclear arsenal.

So that’s that I suppose. Pretty disappointing- I would prefer we bite the bullet now and get rid of this regime, whatever the cost. But that doesn’t seem to be in the cards.


57 posted on 09/03/2017 1:09:28 PM PDT by TroutGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76

Right. It’s the word “but” that’s the kicker.


59 posted on 09/03/2017 1:09:47 PM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76

Not what he said but ok.


74 posted on 09/03/2017 1:22:22 PM PDT by Williams (Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76

In my opinion, the fact that there is a debate about what he meant is probably good. It means that it was obtuse enough that the North Koreans, including the fat child Kim, will also be unclear about what we plan to do. Uncertainty often brings hesitation and rethinking.


103 posted on 09/03/2017 1:54:32 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson