Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Conflicted Ahead of DACA Decision
Townhall.com ^ | September 3, 2017 | Debra J. Saunders

Posted on 09/03/2017 6:32:49 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 09/03/2017 6:32:49 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
DJT doesn't need "conflicted" here.

He needs to remember the promises he made to his base that put him in the WH.

2 posted on 09/03/2017 6:38:56 AM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

I think he will exempt those now in the system but block future ones.


3 posted on 09/03/2017 6:40:35 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I guess it’s not enough the media makes up stories based on “inside sources” and “high government officials” - now they’re able to write stories based on how they imagine Trump “feels” about something.

What a waste of words.


4 posted on 09/03/2017 6:43:32 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Conflicted!? No, just keep your promise.


5 posted on 09/03/2017 6:48:38 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp is not party specific. Lyn' Ted is still a liar, Good riddance to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The President is in a good position here:

1. Rescind it. This kicks the ball over to Congress.
2. If the RINOs and Dems then want legislation on this issue (as they do and will) veto it unless it is not only very strict on the “Dreamer” issue but also includes full funding for The Wall.


6 posted on 09/03/2017 6:50:25 AM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

Consider the source.

A #neverTrump “conservative”


7 posted on 09/03/2017 6:50:32 AM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

Remember promises, YES!

Just as important: Remember THE LAW!
FOLLOW THE LAW

Give them an inch and they’ll steal a mile.


8 posted on 09/03/2017 6:50:34 AM PDT by V K Lee (DJT: "Sometimes by losing a battle you find a new way to win the war. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Unless Pres. Trump tweets he is “conflicted”
I don’t believe it.
Now, I am going to enjoy a doughnut.


9 posted on 09/03/2017 6:53:28 AM PDT by Leep (Less talk more ACTiON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Any policy towards illegals must - MUST - address the incentives that are set up by that policy. Are you incentivizing more to try their hand at illegal entry or are you incentivizing them to stay home and apply through the legal process?

With 600 million people south of our porous non-existent southern border and untold millions outside the Americas who might also avail themselves of this easy access, there can be only one immigration policy - Stop giving prizes for illegal entry.

Any measure that permits those who entered illegally to benefit from that illegal act is amnesty. And any amnesty will bring millions more invaders.

This must be stopped.

Will you help stop this?
You can help:
Right-click this image and save it. Post it on your Facebook, Twitter and other social media accounts. Send a copy to your Senators and Reps right now and whenever you communicate with them. When you get fundraising solicitations, include a copy in your reply. Send copies to your friends and family and ask them to do likewise. Spread it everywhere.

10 posted on 09/03/2017 6:56:03 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
I think he will exempt those now in the system but block future ones.

I'd be OK with that IF the WALL worked and the Supremes reviewed and reinterpreted the current faulty view of the 14th that allows anchor babies.

11 posted on 09/03/2017 7:10:31 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He is not “conflicted.” he is still negotiating.


12 posted on 09/03/2017 7:13:44 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

He should have taken the easy way out on day 1. Stop issuing new exemptions and let the old ones just expire. He could have done it with no fanfare and got on with business. Now he’s under fire from both sides.


13 posted on 09/03/2017 7:14:19 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Reality bites but tossing every one of them that has known nothing but America would be a bit unseemly - despite what some of the head in the sand "purists" seem to think.

Give some of them a legal route/option to make themselves legal and get rid of the chaff...

14 posted on 09/03/2017 7:22:20 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheana

“He should have taken the easy way out on day 1”

I agree. I think Trump waits on wedge issues as part of his strategy. He thinks it gives the impression that is a well thought out decision. What it actually does is give the opposition time to mobilize and paint him as a monster if he goes the “wrong” way.


15 posted on 09/03/2017 7:35:42 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

I just wonder how a baby who came from Columbia and is 18 now would survive going back to the country of birth. I’m against illegal immigration but is this person at fault?


16 posted on 09/03/2017 7:36:10 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trebb

There is a legal option. Leave and apply from wherever they are to come back in legally.


17 posted on 09/03/2017 7:40:33 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

I would have much preferred that after his installment he had just kept his mouth shut, put his head down, and went to work. He could have accomplished so much more.


18 posted on 09/03/2017 7:50:11 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

The discussion is not about “fault”, rather it’s about bald abrogation of law and process through illegal means to validate an illegal action. It’s a Swiss cheese of invented loopholes that have never been placed into the legislative process for consideration. Rather the appeal has always been to emotion while searching for a false sense of equity.

IOW, illogic piled upon illogic by an administration based upon a lie, leading to those without proper documents excused by one who closed any and all documents that could resolve all doubt on his origin. I hope you’re beginning to sense the irony stabbing liberty in the heart.


19 posted on 09/03/2017 7:52:18 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: skimbell; Kaslin
DJT doesn't need "conflicted" here. He needs to remember the promises he made to his base that put him in the WH.

I agree completely. I hope that the President doesn't lose his nerve and cave to the liberals on this issue, or allow touchy-feely sentimentalism to stand in the way of law enforcement.

To those who say "It isn't the children's fault that their parents came here illegally," the best response is always this: if you steal a car and give it to your son, who had nothing to do with the theft and didn't even know about it, he doesn't get to keep the stolen car just because he wasn't himself the perpetrator. The same applies to children who are brought to the US illegally by their parents.

20 posted on 09/03/2017 7:54:29 AM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson